The Fallacies of Neoliberalism and the Emergence of Human Rights

Alberto Moncada
Translated by Louis Edgar Esparza
Introduction
How is it possible that an economic system that benefits merely ten percent of the populace is accepted by a plurality of the population?
How is it possible that well-regarded popular economists defend this system uncritically, especially now that there is an international reaction against it, translating into political transformations under the thumb of neoliberalism?
Neoliberalism is the ultimate and most extreme version of capitalism, begun by heads of state, Margaret Thatcher in Great Britain and Ronald Reagan in the United States taking advantage of the moment of collapse of the communist system. This final version is accentuated by globalization.
But Globalization is the third chapter in the history of capitalism. The first was state capitalism, colonization, exercised by powerful states over other, weaker ones, to defend themselves against their own risks and to control their activity, generally preferring the use of force. This is the case between Spain and Latin America, between England and India, and between Belgium and the Congo. The protection of states against their own business enterprise will be the subject of the second chapter. The United States sends their Army to protect the interests of the United Fruit Company in Central America, founding the expression "banana republic." In another sense, this is the origin of the military coup in Chile and as usual, with the petroleum problem, with the crisis in the Middle East. In the third chapter, the protagonists are the multinational corporations that benefit from the protection of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and especially the World Trade Organization, to privilege their own interests over the interests of the states on which they are sitting upon. This chapter represents the moment of the most amount of liberty of capital, not so much to open up the borders to free trade, but more to impose upon those countries onto which the labor and environmental laws they exploit. This freedom allows an organizational reinforcement that goes from foreign direct investment to the creation of monetary paradises where they hide their money, leading to the overvalued financial sector and again, the exploitation of the countries in which this occurs.
See full text here

1 comments:
Lech Walesa, the leader of the Solidarity movement in Poland which played a major part in the downfall of Soviet Communism , says he is not a businessman or an economist but he does know that something is very wrong when ten percent of the population controls 100 percent of the wealth.
Our economies based on making money on money instead of making while radically discounting the value of labor and workers has backfired. Labor represents a real tangible value that acts as a money standard.
The cost of goods have to keep in sync with the value of labor for a balanced tradeoff. It has not.
For more information and articles by Ray Tapajna, see http://tapsearch.com/tapartnews http://tapsearch.com/flatworld/
http://www.bizarrepolitics.com/globalization-of-money-products
http://www.bizarrepolitics.com/free-traders-protectionism-myths
http://www.bizarrepolitics.com/ben-says-buy-usa
or search under tapsearch com for hundreds of references related to all of the above.
See http://www.therationale.com from a philosophical and religious perspective about the global economic arena we live in.
Post a Comment